Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Revenge Porn. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Revenge Porn. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Chủ Nhật, 30 tháng 3, 2014

The Duke University Porn Star, Adolescentophilia, and Predatory Capitalism Connection

18 year old Belle Knox has been dubbed the 'Duke porn star' after making headlines last month when her sideline porn gig's cover was blown by a bunch of disproportionately male fellow university students.  They initially made their presence known to Knox on her personal Facebook account with a barrage of random friend requests but she acknowledges not making the real link to her moonlighting as a porn actress being the cause to the sudden surging interest in being her friend until someone in her class started following her alter-ego Twitter feed.

As the campus slut-shaming and fallout harassment escalated, no doubt mainly being caused by her 'adoring male fans' and after Knox's true identity was revealed against her will she choose to write about her experience in a xoJane piece that went viral.         

Knox's own words as to why she choice to pursue this 'career' (for the rest of us not cashing in on this 'career' choice it's otherwise known simply as just 'sex') was because she simply "couldn't afford $60,000 in tuition...I saw a way to graduate from...school free of debt..."



You mean instead of just working two or three part-time jobs and going to a community college, or without going to Seeking Arrangement, or earning a scholarship or taking out a loan, a girl can just prostitute herself out on film to put herself through university?  Get-out-of-here--no way?!   Guess Knox was spared the moral quandaries of most sugar babies when she enthusiastically embraced an industry that's currently shunning her for her lack of experience in it.

Knox elaborated further that being in porn was "something [I] absolutely love.  Because to be clear: My experience in porn has been nothing but supportive, exciting, thrilling and empowering."  Knox asserted in the tell-all tale, that it is the patriarchy that fears female sexuality.

However after also reading an article spotlighting the backlash against Knox's apparent self declared porn stardom it more so appears that she is selling her sex in patriarchal specific porn packaging back to the patriarchy she's supposedly out-crying with full intention to maximize her own profits.  It sounds like Knox's 'experience in porn' was really 'supportive' and 'empowering' when even after she stipulated that she did not want to have sex with someone over the age of 35 on set, she was still paired with a "veteran adult male performer she found "too old and disgusting," although she had approved the scene days before" and "cried" when presented with this older male talent.  Knox indicated that even though her boundaries had not been respected and that she did not know the advanced age of this adult male performer until the day of the shoot, she eventually further compromised her self-imposed boundaries by reneging on them and engaging in sex acts with an older man despite her obvious discomfort over the prospect.  And the footage is of course going to be featured on a "old man/young girl fetish site."

An 18 year old girl has a completely legitimate reason to NOT want to have sex with a man over the age of 35 and it's called adolescentophilia, in this instance.  There is absolutely no denying that throughout the porn industry, as well as thanks to the porn industry, that our culture has been slowly getting conditioned to accept adolescentophilia, especially hebephilia as normative venues to live out erotic fantasies on the adolescent and prepubescent female form.


A female presented in the context above is not only commonplace it also is a plastic ageless fantasy of a virgin-whore concept and there should be no question over the obvious pedophilia over and undertones in this image.  She literally is representational of an idea of a female form whose age could lie anywhere from four to twenty-four, her actual age, is generic.  Because ultimately, in a patriarchy, age is immaterial, it is only about accessible vagina for the preconceived male pleasure.  As virginal vagina is generally typically preferred by the human male in the patriarchal model and as corrupted innocence can get some people hot (or power-tripping), we've somehow allowed adolescentophilia/hebephilia to become permissible, even somehow understandable to the point of nonobservance when it comes to hyper-sexualization.  Hollywood has been notorious for 'age-swapping' actresses for parts 17 years away from their actual age for decades, this goes for older and younger actresses and the prospective roles they play.  
     
The mind of a pedophile and the types and reasons of how certain men become pedophiles should be common knowledge for all but it's not--why?--because supposedly 'sex sells'?  Because the mainly male powers that be can just keep churning out any old kind of imagery without maintaining any type of media literacy for the masses or accountability to the masses, all in the name of monetary profit, and endanger the quality of life for millions and millions of kids of all ages and genders?     


It shouldn't be a big shock to you that child pornography plays a huge role in the development of a pedophile, it's sought after, horded, guarded, shared.  Even the FBI admitted in 2011 it was becoming an increasing menace.  Truly, the societal costs of pornography are staggering and it's even more so staggering how it's seemingly being ignored with silence instead being addressed with candid dialogue as to what rampant accessible porn's long-term effects may be.  The porn industry has actually started to flag due to being inundated with 'talent', that some porn stars have turned to 'escorting', prostituting themselves for 'bareback' (no condom need worn) services - that's a public health issue waiting to happen.  Chlamydia prevalence among young adults in the United States is already twice that among young adults in the Netherlands.

It could easily be argued that Creepshots, RATTERs, Revenge Porn, and Girls Gone Wild are all symptoms of unchecked filmed prostitution and hyper-sexualization of our youth.  The power play of which is disproportionately male, just as this more recent development of the 'Duke porn star' exhibits perfectly.  Knox admitted to essentially being forced to perform sex acts with someone that she didn't even want to have sex with, someone that disgusted her, and blaming it on contractual obligations for her overseen follow-through is absolute total horse-shit, because she's eighteen.  She has only been alive for 10 + 8 years, the human brain doesn't even fully develop until the age of 25 so why did she do something she didn't really want to do and kidded herself she was acting on female sexual empowerment?  Well, beyond Knox's very real lack of developed Moral and Intrapersonal Intelligence, she did it for...   


...the money.

Had higher education not had a high cost or even a tuition, had Knox not feared debt (like so many of us do), had America had a social support system embedded in our culture like the Swiss actually do with theirs and had Knox gotten paid to not only go to college but also got to partake in a Guaranteed $2,800 Monthly Income merely based on citizenship as they do now in Switzerland--would she still have had the need or desire to earn money in exchange for sex acts?  I think not, and I also think her argument of sex-work being "supportive, exciting, thrilling and empowering" is total bunk, especially when one of those experiences lead her to failing victim to an adolescentophilia act that made her cry on set when faced with the reality of her decision to have sex on film for money.  For if you take the work out of sex-work, all that's left is sex and sex should always be free.  Sex should not be a commodity or a ware to sell, and the only reason it is or is portrayed as being so is due to wealth inequality and the disenfranchised female in the patriarchal predatory capitalism model.    

Higher education should also always be free and should not be a commodity or ware to sell because there is honor in the quest for knowledge that triumphs price-tags.  It is the unyielding pursuit of knowledge that has lead us as a creature to fantastical insights to the workings of our universe and it should not be rendered off-limits because you don't have enough money to buy into a country club of education.  A parent's income should not determine the fate of their child in a freethinking society nor limit their child's ability to obtain an education, and that's not an Utopian statement when other countries are currently capable of such social experiments.    

So it seems fitting that a student of a university has brought this to our attentions and it is truly unfortunate that she has come this far in her short young life and sees no real value in nurturing her mind, because the real money's in allowing others to defile her body and compromise not just her physical boundaries, but her moral boundaries as well.

We should all be very sorry to Belle Knox that the crooked path before her has lead to her to no other recourse by which to claim fortune or fame and has even stupidly deluded herself that she is somehow a free agent despite an assortment of external factors that laid that path, sans gold bricks, before her to trod upon because we are all responsible for the virtual 'village' we've constructed to raise this child in, so she could not raise herself above it.  

(Seriously looks like she could still be in middle school).

Belle Knox, I hope the next person you sleep with isn't for money and that the next person you sleep with is because you at least find them attractive if not love them outright because that's true female sexual empowerment, as well as saying no and being listened to.  

And for Knox to so naively shrug off the very real discrimination facing her when she enters the 'traditional work force', when drug addicts and people that file bankruptcies are disqualified from job candidacy every day, is a jarring insight into a youth that's literally disconnected from reality. 


But who pulled her plug?


Thứ Ba, 31 tháng 12, 2013

2013's 13 Chauvinists Of The Year

The following 13 chauvinists have just got to be commemorated for their contributions to misogyny in this year of the snake as 2013 draws to a close.  Unfortunately it was difficult to narrow it down to a mere 13 but here they are, in no particular order:  

#13). Robin Thicke - for his awful music video that ran on like a pre-school porno that recently discovered Twitter existed and completely #negatedthepowerfullyrics.


(Eat the foot, eat it)!

#12). Seth MacFarlane - sang We Saw Your Boobs at the Oscars and trivialized Scarlett Johansson's erape.

(I hate you).

#11). Gavin McInnes - Vice Magazine co-founder managed to decry feminism and declare that women over 40 are all "fucking sad".  

(You're fucking sad brah).

#10). Yumi Stynes - blamed other women for Tropfest's (an event she was hosting) chronic exclusion of lady filmmakers, reflecting that ..."a lot of Twitter chat has been about the lack of female filmmakers here tonight.  There's a couple on there, and listen, if you're going to complain," Stynes complained, "why not go out and make a film yourself, ladies?"  You heard the woman, go make a movie via Grrrl Power!  (Porn doesn't count, LADIES)!  


(There, there.  Irony is supposed to be funny).

#9). Alex Bilmes - editor of Esquire impassively announced that women in his magazine are purposely "ornamental".  Because women are here as beautiful objects to be objectified as an object in the eye of the beholder that decrees what beautiful is because that's an objective perspective.  I wonder if he meant ornamental as in Christmas Tree ornamental or as in parsley next to a steak ornamental?  What's really a bummer?--Bilmes is rather unattractive, as in, sexually unappealing.  I wonder if a woman was editor of Esquire instead, if THAT would be an ornamental position for her?  Hmm...           

(I like my ornaments to ornament their eyes for me).

#8). Billy Ray Cyrus - hands down, is an epic failure at fatherhood albeit a probably very savy businessman.  We watched Miley Cyrus engage in spectacle after spectacle this year like the good little ornament she is, meanwhile we all are forgetting that Noah Cyrus is watching her too.  And has the same dad, hopefully not the same fate... 


(He must be so proud...of his diverse portfolio options). 

...but Noah's already wearing this type of outfit in public:

(Noah Cyrus).

Maybe she can dress up like her older sister Miley for Halloween in 2014!  Miley would be totally cool with it!

(See how cool she is)!

#7). DC Comics - attempted to sexualize suicide by adding character Harley Quinn to the dead-women-in-refrigerators troupe, as a contest!    

  (Anita Sarkeesian explains WiR so well)!

#6). James Taranto - wrote an article where he ridiculously laments over the so-called "war on men" and the criminalization of "male sexuality" spearheaded by "a political campaign against sexual assault in the military."  Maybe someone got him a copy of the documentary The Invisible War for Christmas?  

(Trailer for The Invisible War).

(Looks like feminism made him unhappy).  


#5). Richard Cohen - this opinion writer didn't hold back on calling the Steubenville Rape "so-called [rape]".  So much for those two 'so-called' RAPE CONVICTIONS.  In my opinion, he should read my post on erape so he can get that word in his lexicon and understand that rape need not to involve, you know, just intercourse against your will anymore in this digital era.  However, in all fairness it really is a well written article and he does chastise misogyny--ironically--yet Mr. Cohen does seem to be very misguided in his over focus on Miley Cyrus schooling him on what twerking is and less aware that an erotic dance is not somehow more outrageous then what so-called rape went down in Steubenville, OH.  My sincerest apologizes Mr. Cohen.

(Hopefully, I'm just taking you out of context...)?

#4). Hunter Moore - creator of Is Anyone Up? whose slogan is literally "Pure Evil" and probably can be accredited for popularizing the term "revenge porn".   

(This is what Moore looks like with less eyebrow, *shudder*).


#3). Backroom Casting Couch - oh, it's like erape porn, which is like 'unknowingly being sexually exploited'--that's what erape is in a nutshell.  Male fantasy in it's darkest form describes it as well.  Just click on this link and this link to get a better understanding what this bullshit is.  So anyone that 'works' for Backroom Casting Couch, you can go to hell.  Real actresses or disadvantaged women, wait, that's laughable, GIRLS, either way, the concept of fucking someone to "get ahead" shouldn't outlive itself in 2014.  (Let's hope).  But this creepy porn site aids in the proliferation of that notion and helps creeps whack off.  If these aren't actresses and truly is 'the real deal', then hordes of males are masturbating to erape which I personally find VERY disturbing.       

#2). Tom Leykis - this shock jock did an erape live on air in 1998 of Karen Carpenter which caused her major emotional distress but won the case against him even though the recording of the show--needed as evidence--was 'misplaced'.    He's also well known for his 'Leykis 101' where he instructs men on how to get laid with as little effort as possible.  

(I know what you're thinking, how can someone so cute behave in such a disgusting manner)?


#1). Holger Osieck - quipped back in June that "women should shut-up in public" and chalked it up to a "funny remark" that ended up getting completely misunderstood.  Yeah...  ...I'm going to shut-up now.

(All that's needed is a needle and some thread).  

     

Thứ Hai, 16 tháng 12, 2013

Revenge Porn, "Ratters", Creepshots, Is All ERAPE And This Is Why...

...I thought I knew what Revenge Porn was.

And maybe dear reader, you might not even have heard of Revenge Porn yet.  This woman does an excellent job of breaking it down:



But not until I read this article based on true accounts, did I become aware that a seemingly disproportionate amount of women and girls had been hacked for intimate photos they had never even planned on sharing willingly with others.  As if the notion of Revenge Porn in and of itself weren't despicable enough.  But getting hacked, having private information getting blasted over the internet, resulting in the loss of relationships, friendships, jobs, and lives?--that's just an evil notion to "profit" off of.  Where there was not even a so-called "revenge" committed just a random series of malicious acts on a stranger having done no wrong doing at all.  And where does the data mining stop?--are drunken cleavage shots game?--bikini's?  Some of these photos were Photoshop-ed and occasionally Photoshop lies can be very precise:       



Hunter Moore, creator of IsAnyoneUp?--the first original Revenge Porn site--appears to have little remorse and feels little responsibility despite being an originator of this idea and enabler of like-minded others to have a platform to share a common interest in being creepy, soulless, infants.  



It's erape, it's sexual exploitation.  It's a gross violation of social trust.  It's setting a terrible example to the younger generations.  It's awful that law enforcement does so little!      
   
It's truly terrifying how many women don't know the real dangers that can be out there.

Charlotte Laws is calling it cyber rape, I've been calling it erape, but before concepts of a supposed digital abstract "rape" can even be hoped to be remotely understood, it's important to understand the word rape in and of itself.  The dictionary definition of rape is varied but I'm going to stick with the nonsexual definition of the word actually for this purpose which means to plunder, to spoil, to carry off by force, so rape is really about brutalization, having no reverence for sanctity, to ruin, to take away, to choose your choice for you.  Sexual rape means lack of consent at its core.  I did not give you consent, I said no, you hit me, you fondled me, you leered at me, you breathed on me, you touched me, when said no.           

Sexual rape is a physical violation, that you can be conscious of or not be conscious of happening but you personally rather it not happen yet it is and against your will.  Against your consent.  If your body is a temple someone is defiling your temple.  They take something from you, they make you feel like a disposable object and then ask how you could have prevented it when it's done to you, when you ask for justice.  While your rape kit rots on a shelf.  

Erape is as just as physically and emotionally violating and devastating as physical sexual rape because it's the fucking Goddamn ultimate invasion of privacy.  It's the ultimate mindfuck and it should be criminalized, it should be illegal, it should be handled seriously.  But right now, regular ol' rape isn't handled seriously enough, if at all.  You know what phrase I wish will die in the next 50 years?--"Boys will be boys."  You know how many rapes or sexual assaults and sentencing that phrase has probably glossed over like an effect from Photoshop?  Boys will be, what?!--not held accountable for their actions?

I remember being a child and watching like a Donahue type show and this woman called in, giving the most heartbreaking account of a gang rape she experienced in her home, while wearing a granny gown and a night-robe, in advanced stages of pregnancy.  She was a victim of a home invasion at the hands of some bored teen-aged males and she eventually lost a baby she actually wanted.  Each boy got a slap on a wrist and barely a criminal sentence apiece, can't remember how long, but even in my small head I remember thinking, "That's...that's...it?"  The women proceeded to inquire of the judge why, why were you so lenient on them, and the judge said to her, "Boys will be boys."  Her voice broke over the phone on the television, faceless, she protested that she was safe in her home, not even her ankles showing, not dressed like a whore "deserving to get raped" "just asking for it", that all she had been expecting was a baby...

We can't treat erape as just another "boys being boys" situation and we can't let them cry about the infringement on their rights and mince over copyright law.  That's not what this is about.

It's about a lack of consent and dare I say, knowledge.  

Like a creepshot is a form of erape.  But you'd have to even know what a creepshot was to ascertain if you're the subject of one.  Lemme paint an innocent enough picture for you, you feel bloated and you want some ice cream and it's like 2:00AM, so you slap on your yoga pants and drive up to the gas station, the ice cream that you wanted was on a shelf too low or a shelf too high and you were too preoccupied with you task to notice the creeper with a yoga pants fetish hovering about taking highly sexually proactive photos of you, without your knowledge or consent on his smartphone.  To later get uploaded, on a forum where other creeps do the same shit, it's like a game to them, and they masturbate to you, and they grade you, critique you.  These are not the type of men or boys, you want to date, get married to, and have children with, God forbid, have daughters with.  It's not as easy for us ladies to spot the rapist and the pedophile right from the rip, you assholes don't exactly come with "tramp stamps" - if ya know what I mean.                                

What if they get enough of your face during a creepshot and they upload to a Facebook account they manage (try looking up just "yoga pants" on Facebook the next time you log in and see what you find) and through Facebook's new face recognition software the creeper knows your name?!  They've found your online profile and maybe an email address, phone number, and IM handle.  That's all they need to invade your life if they so desire.  Or they are hackers and hack into your phone and steal all those naked selfies you decided to not send your ex after-all...   

When I think about Amanda Todd...



...about very young girls making YouTube videos of themselves to get evaluated on a false idea of beauty voluntarily asking complete strangers, "Am I pretty or am I ugly?"...

(Why aren't you busy inventing a new computer programming language instead?!  Oh that's right, we got investors in pink dye).

...when I think about RAT operators referring to the females they stalk and erape at will as slaves...

...I wonder if on your hypothetical way to the gas station bloated one day in yoga pants for ice cream the truck your driving behind has this kind of paint job on his tailgate...


...would the driver be a "ratter", a creepshot taker, a revenge porn uploader or just a revenge porn view, just your average normal eraping guy or are those tailgates blank, more low profile, less "hilarious"?

Defend the women in your life.  Especially if most dudes would erape them, while raping them, hogtied, and calling them a slut.  


ALSO READ:

The Price of Pleasure: Porn, Sex, and Silence - Part I

The Duke University Porn Star, Adolescentophilia, and Predatory Capitalism Connection

Does Porn Aide In The Creation Of Sexual Serial Killers?

The #AfterSex Selfie - Is It Pushing Digital Boundaries On The Topic Of Love?

3 Contemporary Inspirational Women You Needed To Know About Yesterday

Why Lovelace's Ordeal Is Our Ordeal

*IS* This REALLY The Best Way To Check Deez Nutz, Fellas?

DON JON, Despite The "Joisey" Accents, It Is STILL A Great Flick! - (film review) ***MINOR SPOILERS*** 

Thứ Năm, 15 tháng 8, 2013

How The Facebook Page For 12 Year Old Rapist Memes Just Became Munchausen Syndrome's Facebook Page

So...it all started with this article by Mary Elizabeth Williams called 'The War On 12-Year-Old-Girls', it has since ended in the film 'Eden'.

I'm currently reading 'What Do Women Want? Adventures in the Science of Female Desire
by Daniel Bergner and this is after reading Peggy Orenstein's 'Cinderella Ate My Daughter' while endeavoring to get through 'Gulp' by Mary Roach.

During this recent reading journey what I've come to realize is that the ceaseless cries of manufactured males, screaming frat house catch phrases at each other and putting Revenge Porn on the internet, is a culture war, this is a knowledge war, yet we are in the midst of a Communications Revolution and we can literally just MAKE our own culture, we don't have to buy it any more.


I decided to retaliate against 12 Yr Old Sluts because grown men calling children sluts is not okay.  It's not something I could personally condone.  Something in me, perhaps a higher calling of maternal instinct kicked in (which is how a childless woman can still be an asset to society) and I lashed out.  I made a 12-Year-Old-Rapist-Meme Facebook page hoping that by pointing out the irony of being completely unable to identify a twelve year old boy as a rapist, raped, or promiscuous is impossible to discern in a glance or a once over but why do so many males do that with such a sense of correctness to us?


You're either too old, too young, too overweight, too crazy, too smart, too loud, too emotional...too much or not enough of something to earn his complete respect let alone a wedding ring.  So many males seem to just stop seeing their multitude of flaws, the same eyes that see each imperfection and short-coming of every aspect of our being.  We have men who are political/religious/media leaders blaming women in the workforce as part of the collapse of the American Family Unit, while they demonstrate more person-hood to a fetus than an actual person who's already here on the planet, who like to judge the so-called welfare queens for expecting handouts, where we are told having an abortion makes us more susceptible for breast cancer, we are paid less, underrepresented and OVER sexualized in the media (to the point where spell check keeps asking if instead of sexualized did I mean serialized) , office boardrooms, and politics--all while more households have a single head whom is a woman.


When did men start to think it's okay, even funny, to bully, taunt, cyber-stalk, and commit a thousand other sexual slights to our mothers, daughters, sisters, maybe actually to you?--has it always been?--will it always be?  Why has feminine energy been reduced to sex and motherhood with a thousand frivolous vanities?  And why are so many females compliant to just go along with it?  Are they that ignorant of reality?


But back to the topic at hand, the updated FB page, none of my memes on Rapist 12 Year Olds after the first few days were true to the page's theme.  I didn't promote it a lot, only had three likes, and all my comments were from angry males insulted by the page that found it difficult to articulate as to why.


This blog gets far more steady traffic and I wanted to share my collection of articles and pictures with you, constant reader, thus retiring the tittle of 12-Year-Old-Rapist-Memes to Munchausen Syndrome.


The preordained kyriarchy we are enmeshed in is a Munchausen syndrome that needs to end in this generation so that other generations may live harmoniously instead of in the hellish discord we've been experiencing.


Thank you for reading.  Please, feel free to visit the new Munchausen Syndrome Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/Munchausen.Syndrome.Zizzer.Zazzer.Zuzz and share what needs sharing.