slutty selfies - ( a poem)

Ridgeliodoslynn--

--you bitches wanna try showin' some more skin?

how phat is your slim and do you only drink skim?

so selfish with your selfies, you narcissistic junkies

'cause you never post yourself frumpy or a mess but ya like to show your tummies

ta all your buddies

always looking fit, showing a little tit or a whole lotta breast,

kissing on the drunk girlfriends who always look their best

<<<at various bars>>>

&

<<<in various cars>>>

Hi hoe, hope you don't break a heel while the mens break their necks

perfect as your selfies show, I'm still seeing lil' specks

lipstick doesn't wear forever you know, and lust still must leave a dick limp at conquest

and I'm really sick of having to filter through all the selfish actions you do do

you little tempest,

see I only want the attentions of just one cock so at my behest from his page I wish he'd block 

the (doo-doo) = Ridgeliodoslynns rot

before those bitches show my husband more skins from their ilk and their lot

so young and so slim

but you won't be a size four with perky boobs forever.

and with what you post I see you hoes loose with more booze a little more of your dignity weekly - so could you dress even more skimpily? 

<<<I inquire sarcastically>>>  

so bitch please, pack your puppies away, 'cause dogs have fleas 

and some you don't even want to stay, much less look your way...

I know you think little of it all because you all have little minds

ain't everybody gotta be your "friend"--especially my man, he ain't your kind.

you don't need all men's eyes to shine on YOU all the time for the rest of your lives

ain't no crime in having a mystique to your physique

or else little girls face the wrath of all the wives 

'cause the wife is the potato farm and youse all small fries

so no small wonder then when you finally become a meme 'cause I'm bettin's

you bitches don't probably properly use your privacy settin's!!!

The Duke University Porn Star, Adolescentophilia, and Predatory Capitalism Connection

18 year old Belle Knox has been dubbed the 'Duke porn star' after making headlines last month when her sideline porn gig's cover was blown by a bunch of disproportionately male fellow university students.  They initially made their presence known to Knox on her personal Facebook account with a barrage of random friend requests but she acknowledges not making the real link to her moonlighting as a porn actress being the cause to the sudden surging interest in being her friend until someone in her class started following her alter-ego Twitter feed.

As the campus slut-shaming and fallout harassment escalated, no doubt mainly being caused by her 'adoring male fans' and after Knox's true identity was revealed against her will she choose to write about her experience in a xoJane piece that went viral.         

Knox's own words as to why she choice to pursue this 'career' (for the rest of us not cashing in on this 'career' choice it's otherwise known simply as just 'sex') was because she simply "couldn't afford $60,000 in tuition...I saw a way to graduate from...school free of debt..."

You mean instead of just working two or three part-time jobs and going to a community college, or without going to Seeking Arrangement, or earning a scholarship or taking out a loan, a girl can just prostitute herself out on film to put herself through university?  Get-out-of-here--no way?!   Guess Knox was spared the moral quandaries of most sugar babies when she enthusiastically embraced an industry that's currently shunning her for her lack of experience in it.

Knox elaborated further that being in porn was "something [I] absolutely love.  Because to be clear: My experience in porn has been nothing but supportive, exciting, thrilling and empowering."  Knox asserted in the tell-all tale, that it is the patriarchy that fears female sexuality.

However after also reading an article spotlighting the backlash against Knox's apparent self declared porn stardom it more so appears that she is selling her sex in patriarchal specific porn packaging back to the patriarchy she's supposedly out-crying with full intention to maximize her own profits.  It sounds like Knox's 'experience in porn' was really 'supportive' and 'empowering' when even after she stipulated that she did not want to have sex with someone over the age of 35 on set, she was still paired with a "veteran adult male performer she found "too old and disgusting," although she had approved the scene days before" and "cried" when presented with this older male talent.  Knox indicated that even though her boundaries had not been respected and that she did not know the advanced age of this adult male performer until the day of the shoot, she eventually further compromised her self-imposed boundaries by reneging on them and engaging in sex acts with an older man despite her obvious discomfort over the prospect.  And the footage is of course going to be featured on a "old man/young girl fetish site."

An 18 year old girl has a completely legitimate reason to NOT want to have sex with a man over the age of 35 and it's called adolescentophilia, in this instance.  There is absolutely no denying that throughout the porn industry, as well as thanks to the porn industry, that our culture has been slowly getting conditioned to accept adolescentophilia, especially hebephilia as normative venues to live out erotic fantasies on the adolescent and prepubescent female form.

A female presented in the context above is not only commonplace it also is a plastic ageless fantasy of a virgin-whore concept and there should be no question over the obvious pedophilia over and undertones in this image.  She literally is representational of an idea of a female form whose age could lie anywhere from four to twenty-four, her actual age, is generic.  Because ultimately, in a patriarchy, age is immaterial, it is only about accessible vagina for the preconceived male pleasure.  As virginal vagina is generally typically preferred by the human male in the patriarchal model and as corrupted innocence can get some people hot (or power-tripping), we've somehow allowed adolescentophilia/hebephilia to become permissible, even somehow understandable to the point of nonobservance when it comes to hyper-sexualization.  Hollywood has been notorious for 'age-swapping' actresses for parts 17 years away from their actual age for decades, this goes for older and younger actresses and the prospective roles they play.  

     

The mind of a pedophile and the types and reasons of how certain men become pedophiles should be common knowledge for all but it's not--why?--because supposedly 'sex sells'?  Because the mainly male powers that be can just keep churning out any old kind of imagery without maintaining any type of media literacy for the masses or accountability to the masses, all in the name of monetary profit, and endanger the quality of life for millions and millions of kids of all ages and genders?     

It shouldn't be a big shock to you that child pornography plays a huge role in the development of a pedophile, it's sought after, horded, guarded, shared.  Even the FBI admitted in 2011 it was becoming an increasing menace.  Truly, the societal costs of pornography are staggering and it's even more so staggering how it's seemingly being ignored with silence instead being addressed with candid dialogue as to what rampant accessible porn's long-term effects may be.  The porn industry has actually started to flag due to being inundated with 'talent', that some porn stars have turned to 'escorting', prostituting themselves for 'bareback' (no condom need worn) services - that's a public health issue waiting to happen.  Chlamydia prevalence among young adults in the United States is already twice that among young adults in the Netherlands.

It could easily be argued that Creepshots, RATTERs, Revenge Porn, and Girls Gone Wild are all symptoms of unchecked filmed prostitution and hyper-sexualization of our youth.  The power play of which is disproportionately male, just as this more recent development of the 'Duke porn star' exhibits perfectly.  Knox admitted to essentially being forced to perform sex acts with someone that she didn't even want to have sex with, someone that disgusted her, and blaming it on contractual obligations for her overseen follow-through is absolute total horse-shit, because she's eighteen.  She has only been alive for 10 + 8 years, the human brain doesn't even fully develop until the age of 25 so why did she do something she didn't really want to do and kidded herself she was acting on female sexual empowerment?  Well, beyond Knox's very real lack of developed Moral and Intrapersonal Intelligence, she did it for...   

...the money.

Had higher education not had a high cost or even a tuition, had Knox not feared debt (like so many of us do), had America had a social support system embedded in our culture like the Swiss actually do with theirs and had Knox gotten paid to not only go to college but also got to partake in a Guaranteed $2,800 Monthly Income merely based on citizenship as they do now in Switzerland--would she still have had the need or desire to earn money in exchange for sex acts?  I think not, and I also think her argument of sex-work being "supportive, exciting, thrilling and empowering" is total bunk, especially when one of those experiences lead her to failing victim to an adolescentophilia act that made her cry on set when faced with the reality of her decision to have sex on film for money.  For if you take the work out of sex-work, all that's left is sex and sex should always be free.  Sex should not be a commodity or a ware to sell, and the only reason it is or is portrayed as being so is due to wealth inequality and the disenfranchised female in the patriarchal predatory capitalism model.    

Higher education should also always be free and should not be a commodity or ware to sell because there is honor in the quest for knowledge that triumphs price-tags.  It is the unyielding pursuit of knowledge that has lead us as a creature to fantastical insights to the workings of our universe and it should not be rendered off-limits because you don't have enough money to buy into a country club of education.  A parent's income should not determine the fate of their child in a freethinking society nor limit their child's ability to obtain an education, and that's not an Utopian statement when other countries are currently capable of such social experiments.    

So it seems fitting that a student of a university has brought this to our attentions and it is truly unfortunate that she has come this far in her short young life and sees no real value in nurturing her mind, because the real money's in allowing others to defile her body and compromise not just her physical boundaries, but her moral boundaries as well.

We should all be very sorry to Belle Knox that the crooked path before her has lead to her to no other recourse by which to claim fortune or fame and has even stupidly deluded herself that she is somehow a free agent despite an assortment of external factors that laid that path, sans gold bricks, before her to trod upon because we are all responsible for the virtual 'village' we've constructed to raise this child in, so she could not raise herself above it.  

(Seriously looks like she could still be in middle school).

Belle Knox, I hope the next person you sleep with isn't for money and that the next person you sleep with is because you at least find them attractive if not love them outright because that's true female sexual empowerment, as well as saying no and being listened to.  

And for Knox to so naively shrug off the very real discrimination facing her when she enters the 'traditional work force', when drug addicts and people that file bankruptcies are disqualified from job candidacy every day, is a jarring insight into a youth that's literally disconnected from reality. 

But who pulled her plug?

Feminist Armchair Regime: "Genital mutilation isn't funny" - A Thoughtful Response

Feminist Armchair Regime: Genital mutilation isn't funny: The following is cross-posted from the  Damsel in de Tech  blog. Click  here  to see the original. Every once in a while there's a new...



I wrote what's below as a comment to this blog post (a blog I enjoy reading) however of course the comment post was too long so I'm just going to post the comment as my own blog post to serve as what I hope will be interpreted as a thoughtful response to their piece on how male castration isn't funny, male castration is NOT funny, of course, but there needs to be more dialogue on the topic.  In order to completely understand my comment, you also must read their blog post that elicited my comment.  So merely for your thoughtful consideration dear reader:



I actually disagree.  If we ever develop the type of justice system necessary to deduce without flaw or margin of error that a rapist raped or that a molester molested, I think there should be a real threat of becoming an eunuch with what you did 'scared' on your face.  If people, in particular, women, girls, boys, effeminate men, have to live in preemptive fear to take strides daily to avoid rape, torture, retardation, permanent disabilities, and death, I think that's a major problem.  I think what would balance out a rape culture is an accountability culture.  Instead we have developed a habit of avoiding becoming a victim (carrying mace as a "precaution") and the real issue of avoiding creating serial rapists/molesters/violators of other persons is completely sidelined.  It isn't funny when a man gets castrated, especially when our pool of men is steadily shrinking due to environmental toxins/endocrine disruptors, however, perhaps the best tactic to eliminate sexual violence is to eliminate the cause of that sexual violence.  And typically the weapon wielded is nothing more than an engorged penis.  I know it sounds very radical, I am not saying I am inherently right, but I do feel that at some point prison (if the offender even does get penalized) does not suffice but the patriarchy in general does not suffice.


And what is the elimination of the male foreskin?--nothing more then genital mutilation but it's accepted socially and even preferred by most as the ideal penis, circumcised vs uncircumcised, (those are "pole results" that I would like to see).


Frankly, we've already entered an era of transparency, it's already happening and technology has changed everything and no doubt will revolutionize the justice system whenever it finally does take a foothold and an era of accountability takes hold.  For instance this "Revenge Porn" phenomenon and/or "Creepshots" phenomenon, it's an abstract physical violation, not unlike engaging in coitus with someone who is incapacitated and thereby against their freewill because at its pith that is what rape is, someone decrying your ownership to your own inherent sexuality, it's instead shucked for the sexual gratification, at times, of unknown others.  How nice would it be, with just the install of an app on your Google Glasses for a single lady to access a potential sexual partner and learn that five previous sexual encounters by that male were recorded without consent and broadcast all over The Internet unknowingly and against the will of their female sexual partner, all of sudden that cute guy at the end of the bar isn't so cute anymore is he?--and to me, that would be a symbolic, electronic form of castration and one that's necessary for all the rest of us that aren't sexual deviants so we can walk freely as intelligent thinking beings with our own sexual autonomy not as dominated sexual beings, and not have to take preemptive precautions at being literally or figuratively defiled.


I tried starting this dialogue in my blog post entitled, "Revenge Porn, "Ratters", Creepshots, Is All ERAPE And This Is Why..."


Epidemic male on female rape in South Africa is what created the RapeAx device, otherwise an item born from the mother of invention due to *necessity*.  More like internal mace, it's a safeguard against rape that does threaten to mutilate the male rapist's genitalia and it serves as a rape deterrent not just for those wearing it, it serves as a rape deterrent for all females that would otherwise be targeted because, *gasping shock of air* the potential rapist is unable to discern who wears one and who doesn't until it would be too late for the rapist to know for sure.  So it reverses that aura of uncertainty and fear, it is not the woman fearing being raped it is the man fearing castration or pain to his genitals by the act of raping.  


That is a serious and real power-shift. 


And to critique amusement, that's a difficult thing to do because typically people laugh at uncomfortable truths!  Does it make men uncomfortable that instead of women being worried if they "wear the wrong thing" or go "to the wrong place" at the "wrong time of day" "without having a buddy system in place" or that if mothers don't have to worry about their children getting sodomized by a friend, neighbor or family member, that instead perhaps the men have to live up to a higher expectation of themselves instead of penetrating sexual beasts, does all that make them uncomfortable?--you better believe it terrifies them and brings them discomfort.  You better believe that notions of men becoming women (the true fear) by loss of penis makes most men uncomfortable as hell, which is why they laugh.  And a woman, dear sexless God, do you remember Lorena Bobbit???--an abusive relationship/marriage, that ended in castration of wife against husband in 1993 for an act of rape, I was 8 or 9 years old when that happened and that was and still is a rare concept for many to grasp back then that a wife could be raped by her husband...   ...people laugh and joke about things that make them uncomfortable for the most part and here it is 2014, and it'll sound cold, but I don't think feminists should worry themselves about male castration jokes, when there's still too many dead baby jokes, blonde jokes, and battered women jokes flying around.  Forgive me, I'm a huge fan of your work, I like what you do, but this point, I do not agree on fully.  It is also a very trivial thing to focus on when we have SO MANY social ills to correct. 


Especially when chances are that the uncomfortable titters from the audience emanate from men.                        

In America, Nobody Cares. And This Is What It Feels Like

It's like when you have trace amounts of blood coming out of your nostrils and your anus, and nobody cares.

It's like when you're eight years old and your dad is hitting you repeatedly in a Chevy Monte Carlo going 25-35 miles an hour in stop and go suburban consumer "traffic" and everybody's staring straight ahead because it's not their fucking business if they glance away fast enough, and nobody cares.

It's like you gotta walk home in subzero temperatures at 2:30AM for a mile and a half, because, again, nobody cares.

But if someone thanks God during an Oscar acceptance speech, oh, then, then everybody fucking cares.

And if the New York Mets get brought up, oh, somebody fucking CARES then man.  Whew, boy!  Do they ever!

Or if you bring up LeBron James, then all of a sudden...  Everybody.  Fucking.  Cares. 

Well you know what America?  FUCK you, fuck you from the fucking inside out baby because when blood comes out of Lady Liberty's asshole, guess what?--ain't nobody no fucking where gonna care about YOU.